In January 2016, the iStopMM project commenced work on screening all adults over the age of 40 in Iceland, with the aim of preventing Myeloma before it develops.
Multiple Myeloma is a type of blood cancer that develops from plasma cells, which are a specific type of white blood cells important in normal defences against pathogens through the production of specific antibodies. It mostly presents in patients over 40 years old, however can rarely present in younger people. Traditional symptoms include anaemia, renal failure, bone pain with bone lesions and hyper-calcaemia, sometimes accompanied by repeated infections and AL Amyloidosis.
There are two conditions that are defined as precursors to Multiple Myeloma, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS), and a more advanced precursor called Smouldering Multiple Myeloma. The risk of progression from MGUS to Multiple Myeloma has been found to be 1% per year and for Smouldering Multiple Myeloma the risk of progression to Multiple Myeloma is 10% per year during the first five years1.
Some studies have found that patients diagnosed with a precursor condition and consequently followed up by regular monitoring have a superior survival rate than patients diagnosed only after progression to Multiple Myeloma. However, at present only 2.7 to 6% of Multiple Myeloma patients are diagnosed in a precursor stage coincidently when the patient is being investigated for another reason2-4.
These facts raise two important questions:
Is population-based screening for MGUS beneficial for patients?
What’s the optimum monitoring approach for patient management?
The Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma study (iStopMM) is the first population-based screening study for MGUS which includes a randomised trial of follow-up strategies designed to answer these key questions.
Want to find out more?
Enter your details to receive the latest updates on the iStopMM Study
<ol>
<li>Kyle, R. A. et al. <span style="color: #222222;">Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. <em>Leukemia</em> 24, 1121–1127 (2010).</span></li>
<li>Sigurdardottir, E. E. et al. <span style="color: #222222; background: white;">The role of diagnosis and clinical follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on survival in multiple myeloma. <em>JAMA Oncol.</em> 1, 168–174 (2015).</span></li>
<li>Go, R. S., Gundrum, J. D. & Neuner, J. M. Determining the clinical significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a SEER-medicare population analysis. <em style="color: #222222;">Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> 15, 117–186 (2015).</span></li>
<li>Goyal, G. et al. Impact of prior diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy on outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. <em style="color: #222222;">Leukemia</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> 33, 1273–1277 (2019).</span></li>
<li>Rögnvaldsson, S., Love, T.J., Thorsteinsdottir, S. <em style="color: #222222;">et al.</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> Iceland screens, treats, or prevents multiple myeloma (iStopMM): a population-based screening study for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and randomized controlled trial of follow-up strategies. </span><em style="color: #222222;">Blood Cancer J.</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> 11</span><strong style="color: #222222;">, </strong><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">94 (2021).</span></li>
</ol>